HUD Awards $1.6 Billion for Local Homeless Programs

HUD Awards $1.6 Billion for Local Homeless Programs
Funding support to thousands of local homeless housing and service programs
WASHINGTON – U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Juli├ín Castro today awarded $1.6 billion in grants to provide funding to 6,400 local homeless housing and service programs across the U.S., Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands. View a complete list of all the state and local homeless projects awarded funding.
The Tier 1 Continuum of Care (CoC) grants announced today support the Obama Administration's efforts to end homelessness by providing critically needed housing and support services to individuals and families experiencing homelessness. HUD will award approximately $300 million in "Tier 2 grants" in the spring to support hundreds more local programs. 
To view HUD's full press release, click here
For the latest news, resources and grant information, visit our website at
National Coalition for Homeless Veterans
333 1/2 Pennsylvania Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20003
202-546-1969 or toll-free 1-800-VET-HELP

Address postal inquiries to:
National Coalition for Homeless Veterans
333 1/2 Pennsylvania Ave. SE
Washington, DC 20003
Powered By

Using the Wrong Tools to Build Affordable Housing

Posted by Alan Mallach on March 1, 2016

Along with most Rooflinesreaders, I believe that having some portion of a community’s housing as long term or permanently affordable is a desirable policy goal. That said, though, I’ve found myself wondering what might be the best way to actually pursue that goal. It is by no means obvious that the default answer of “build it” is the right one. About eight years ago, I spent a few weeks in France talking to developers, nonprofits, and public officials there about how they did affordable housing. It’s well known that from the 1950s through the '70s, France built huge public housing projects, a lot of them on the outskirts of major cities, only to see many of them turn into a social nightmare. The French learned some lessons from this experience. As a result, they came up with a very different approach.
Now, when French developers build subdivisions or condo projects, nonprofit housing corporations enter into turnkey contracts with the developer to buy blocs of apartments or houses, up to a maximum of 50 percent, of the units in the development. Based on those contracts, the nonprofits apply for a package of government loans, grants, and tax breaks so they can both buy the units and make sure they remain affordable. When the projects are completed, the nonprofit buys the units and operates them as affordable rental housing. I wrote a chapter about this program in a book that Nico Calavita and I wrote about inclusionary housing a few years ago. On top of that, the government also provides tax incentives for mom and pop owners to buy condos and rent them to affordable and middle-income renters; and it also offers combinations of tax incentives and zero percent second mortgages to enable moderate-income families to buy homes and condos in the same developments.
The point is that developers do what they do best, which is to build housing, and the housing programs take it from there. As a result, a lot of French housing developments contain a mix of both market-rate and subsidized rental units, and both market-rate and subsidized owner-occupied units. We could learn something from that approach.
Even though we don’t like to talk about it, most everyone in the housing industry knows that many market developers create a decent product for a lot less than Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) projects going up in the same area. There may be some differences in materials and finishes, but that doesn’t account for most of the cost difference. Even in relatively low-cost areas like Arizona, unit costs on most new LIHTC projects run $200,000 to $250,000 and up, but developers in Phoenix are selling brand new three bedroom, two bath houses for well under $200,000. Market discipline has its uses.
Meanwhile, lots of areas have a lot of good existing housing available. When I checked recently on Zillow, there were over 1,000 houses for sale in Phoenix at $200,000 or less, but Phoenix is, believe it or not, a higher than average cost housing market. In the fall of 2015 (again from Zillow) the median sales price in Dallas was $132,500, Columbus $118,000, Tulsa $107,400, and on. These are not low-end prices; they are citywide medians. And these are not low-end cities. If one could use LIHTC funds simply to buy blocs of units from developers, or buy existing homes on the private market and turn them into long-term affordable rental housing, we might end up creating a lot more affordable housing than under the current system. We would save millions in construction costs, transaction costs, and in the costs of keeping projects alive for year after year while putting together ever more complicated subsidy layering schemes, and dramatically reduce the multi-year lag from when a project is first conceived to when the first tenants move in.
On top of that, this approach offers ways to further fair housing and help families move into areas of opportunity that could be executed far more simply and efficiently than the current struggle of convincing suburban municipalities to rezone land for LIHTC projects, or permit them to happen. The great majority of LIHTC projects are located in areas that have weak markets or no markets at all—low value, high-poverty inner city areas—as this map of the Rochester, New York area illustrates below. Almost all of the LIHTC projects in the Rochester area are in places with poverty rates of 40 percent or more. While some of these projects may be contributing to the revival of those areas, many are there because it’s the path of least resistance. Meanwhile, good houses in solid neighborhoods, both urban and suburban, are available at far less cost.

The darker the color, the higher the poverty, with the darkest color showing areas where 40% or more of the population is below the poverty level. Each triangle represents a separate LIHTC project. SOURCE: PolicyMap]

I’m not suggesting that we stop building new purpose-built affordable housing projects, just a lot less. The approach I’ve described might not be the best strategy everywhere. There are some circumstances where an LIHTC project can actually make a real difference for a struggling urban neighborhood, although I think they are fewer than often claimed. There are also a few places in the United States, like San Francisco and Washington, DC where the market has just gotten too expensive, and where conventional LIHTC projects, even if they cost $300,000 or more per unit, are still a good deal. These areas, however, are the exceptions.
The LIHTC program currently can not be used to buy houses in good condition—whether existing or newly built—and virtually no other money is available for that purpose. I realize we’re doing what we can with the tools we have, but they may not be the right tools. Instead of going on using them, perhaps we should be thinking more about whether what we’re doing really makes the most sense for the millions of families who not only need better housing, but deserve the opportunity to live in better neighborhoods, and how we might change things.
Photo credit: Courtesy of Nexity, a French housing developer. The photo is of a project in a small city in Brittany, in which Nexity sold half of the units to a non-profit housing corporation for social rental housing. The other half were sold to homebuyers at market rate.

Don't Build (So Much) Affordable Housing!

In this issue: Alan Mallach ● Are the Kids All Right in Austin? ● How Big Can Community Organizing Get?
Tuesday, March 8, 2016


CDFI Collaborations: Keys to Success | OFN
Why are some CDFI collaboration initiatives successful while others are not? This paper, put together by the Opportunity Finance Network, seeks to answer this and related questions by studying 12 emerging, ongoing, and completed CDFI collaborations across the industry.


Call for Nominations | Second Annual HUD Secretary's Award for Healthy Homes
The Department of Housing and Urban Development extends the deadline for eligible entities to submit nominations for the second annual HUD Secretary's Award for Healthy Homes. The new deadline for submissions is March 15, 2016.

Subscribe to 
It's free! Click here! 

Help support the voice of community development 

Donate Button
Your Voice!

Don't Build (So Much) Affordable Housing!
Alan Mallach, Center for Community Progress
Along with most Rooflines readers, I believe that having some portion of a community's housing as long-term or permanently affordable is a desirable policy goal. That said, though, I've found myself wondering what might be the best way to actually pursue that goal . . . More 

Are the Kids All Right? Austin Is Asking
Kelly Weiss, Community Wheelhouse
Recently, here on Rooflines, Tiffany Eng wrote about Oakland's challenges in "family friendly" planning. Here in Austin, demographics show that the number of families in the city is increasing, but this "fact" is misleading. Here's why . . . More

How Big Can *Community* Organizing Get?
Randy Stoecker, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Traditional community organizing is very good at bringing a neighborhood together around a common cause. But can it work for a whole state? . . . More

You Said It!

Here in Boston we have challenges making connections between neighborhood and school for both charters and for district schools. Boston's district school student assignment system is not neighborhood based. That is a consequence of the legacy of racial discrimination in Boston. The city wide lottery system for charter students similarly works against strong neighborhood ties. --Bob Van Meter, LISC Boston, on The Place-Based Charter School?

Mark: Your terms of engagement are compelling. The community land trust movement often finds itself serving as the Steward of inclusionary units required by development law. Your connection to this movement would make a lot of sense as one way to implement your thoughts on "Activating the Mix, Effective Neighboring and Vigilant Humanism." --Richard Lawrence, San Diego Community Land Trust, on A Critical Piece of the Mixed-Income Puzzle

[What] I think we should be exploring further is mixed-use industrial properties. If we allow clean manufacturing to co-locate with office, retail, and/or residential uses, that could be a win-win for cities--especially if housing includes units that are affordable to those working in the manufacturing facility . . . --Chris L
Thanks for posting this article about a vital and under-reported issue. A major reason that industrial uses have been largely ignored by the planning profession is that their inherently low-density character conflicts with the high density fixation of smart growth/TOD . . . --Zelda Bronstein
I disagree with the thesis based on Cincinnati's West End and most of Detroit. Over development of industry is one of the primary reasons for Detroit's decline--with roughly 60 auto manufacturers at its peak down to just three today. What is to be done with all those brownfields? --Eric

Looking for a Job?

Vice President for Applied Research  
The Vice President for Applied Research designs and conducts applied research projects to examine the relationships between economic and demographic disparities in access to economic opportunity, and to support Woodstock Institute's policy advocacy. The research encompasses equitable lending and investments . . . Read Full Listing 

Associate Director,
Affordable Homeownership
CFED is a national nonprofit with a mission of empowering low- and moderate-income households to build and preserve assets. We seek a proven leader who combines a depth of affordable housing policy experience and project management know-how, who thrives on collaboration, curiosity, and . . .  Read Full Listing   
Community Development Director 

The Community Development Director will prepare assessments and inventories of existing community conditions and resources for revitalization and related projects in cooperation with community-based groups, local businesses, individual residents, appropriate city departments and other nonprofit org . . . Read Full Listing 

Director - Single Family Housing 
This position requires strong real estate experience and a genuine commitment to the mission of building and preserving quality housing and transforming communities. The ideal candidate will have experience managing traditional "soft second" and NSP/HOME acquisition/rehab/sale programs, as well as a thorough understanding of . . . Read Full Listing

Public Policy Associate
The Public Policy Associate will work within the External Affairs team to advance NALCAB's 2016 Latino Economic Mobility policy agenda, engage members in the policy process and strengthen strategic relationships with congressional members and federal . . . Read Full Listing

More Job Listings

In This Issue

 Like us on Facebook     Follow us on Twitter     View our profile on LinkedIn 

Shelterforce Weekly 
with your colleagues...

Featured Bloggers
Center for Health, Environment
& Justice

Murtaza Baxamusa
Sol Price School of Public Policy, USC

Housing Assistance Council

Michael Bodaken
National Housing Trust

Raphael Bostic
USC Price School of Public Policy

Janis Bowdler
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

HOPE Credit Union

Burlington Associates

Democracy Collaborative

Jamaal Green
Portland State University

Texas Low Income Housing Information Service

Lisa Hodges
Hodges Development, LLC

Planner, Louisa County, Va.

National CAPACD

Rick Jacobus
Street Level Advisors

Daniel Kravetz
Freelance Writer


Center for Community Progress

Alexandra Moffett-Bateau
City University of New York

Tulane University

Habitat for Humanity

National Urban League


Center on Budget and Policy Priorities  


San Francisco Community 
Land Trust

Shelterforce Weekly

Senior Editor, Lillian M. Ortiz

Associate Editor, Keli Tianga

Publisher, Harold Simon

Assistant Publisher, Terri L. Clegg