Technical Assistance Plan for PATH Program Participation in HMIS

Is this email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD Exchange Mailing List

Technical Assistance Plan for PATH Program Participation in HMIS

On May 27, 2015, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services (SAMHSA) sent a message–below–to all state Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness (PATH) Program contacts and PATH providers outlining their expectations of PATH provider participation in Continuum of Care (CoC) planning and Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) data entry. HUD shares SAMHSA’s goals and encourages CoCs to continue to work with PATH providers to achieve these goals.
Dear State PATH Contacts and PATH Providers:
In November 2013, SAMHSA released the Technical Assistance Plan for PATH Program Participation in Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS), which describes SAMHSA’s goals for PATH participation in HMIS. In December 2013, SAMHSA and its Homeless and Housing Resource Network (HHRN) launched the PATH HMIS learning communities, which are designed to provide support and technical assistance to State PATH Contacts (SPCs) and provider representatives to ensure successful transitions to using HMIS for PATH data collection and care coordination. Additional information is provided below regarding SAMHSA’s expectations for PATH providers’ full participation in HMIS and the technical assistance opportunities available to support these goals.

SAMHSA expects PATH providers to enter client data into the HMIS designated by their local CoC for both coordination of client care and PATH reporting. In addition, SAMHSA expects PATH providers to participate in their local CoC to engage in program planning and implementation activities, discussions regarding effective client service coordination, and discussions to solve issues and challenges related to PATH data collection in HMIS.

SAMHSA has two primary goals for PATH programs in connection with PATH providers entering client data into their local HMIS:

  1. Clients can access permanent or temporary housing more effectively and efficiently through HMIS; many CoCs prioritize individuals for housing using their HMIS, with priority housing placement made for the most vulnerable persons (Coordinated Entry System).
  2. Clients can access a variety of supportive services that address their particular needs; such services are most often provided by partner agencies in the CoC and referrals can be made quickly and easily through the HMIS, often not requiring a separate client intake and/or application for service. This eliminates duplication of effort both for providers and clients.
The underlying philosophy of SAMHSA’s expectation for PATH client data collection in HMIS is to achieve better outcomes for clients who are experiencing homelessness and serious mental illness. Through more efficient and effective client care coordination, SAMHSA and other federal partners expect that clients will achieve better outcomes in obtaining housing and services that address their needs. In addition, SAMHSA anticipates that PATH participation in HMIS will result in more accurate data collection at the local, state, and federal levels, resulting in less duplication of client records, more timely data collection for effective program monitoring and management, more reasonable justifications for program improvement, and better use of resources.
The following items should be taken into consideration related to the HMIS transition:
  1. A sufficient number of data elements need to be entered into HMIS to facilitate PATH client referral to housing and services, depending upon the local HMIS’s requirements for referrals and interagency data sharing. SAMHSA expects PATH providers to enter data into the local HMIS for client care coordination to the degree possible based on the CoC’s HMIS set-up and configurations for interagency data sharing. Difficulties that arise based on the HMIS set-up should be discussed with the state’s SAMHSA Government Project Officer to determine potential alternative solutions for HMIS participation.
  2. Data elements required for the PATH program (as noted in the 2014 HMIS Data Standards) need to be entered into HMIS to correctly generate the PATH Annual Report.
  3. SAMHSA expects client data entry into HMIS in a timely manner in order to achieve the most positive outcomes for clients. Each HMIS will have its own policies and procedures regarding timeliness of data entry for end users.
  4. Ideally, each PATH staff member will be an active and qualified HMIS user, have system licenses, and attend all required HMIS trainings. This facilitates real-time data entry in the field and allows agencies to achieve seamless client care coordination. There should also be at least one staff member in a PATH provider agency who coordinates with HMIS staff on PATH program system set-up in accordance with HUD- and SAMHSA-issued guidance (PATH Program HMIS Manual) and is an active member of any HMIS committees in the CoC.
The PATH HMIS learning communities are designed to assist states/territories in achieving these goals and for participants to share successes and challenges related to this transition. Periodic webinars are also offered to present information related to overcoming common challenges associated with PATH programs’ use of HMIS. SAMHSA expects that SPCs fully participate in all PATH HMIS learning community meetings and webinars. For more information about the learning communities, SPCs may contact their PATH HMIS Learning Community Manager.
SAMHSA continues to expect full PATH participation in HMIS by the end of each state/territory’s fiscal year 2016. Full participation is considered to mean entering all PATH client data directly into the HMIS designated by the local CoC, both for client care coordination and generating the PATH Annual Report.
SAMHSA also expects PATH programs to be actively involved in the development of their CoC’s coordinated entry system. PATH’s involvement is crucial to a comprehensive coordinated entry system and ensures that persons experiencing chronic homelessness who are PATH clients are prioritized for housing and connected to the most appropriate services available in the community. To learn more about the coordinated entry process, please review HUD’s coordinated entry policy brief.
In the event that a PATH provider or an SPC has difficulty or challenges meeting these expectations, SAMHSA expects the SPC to contact their SAMHSA Government Project Officer to arrange for appropriate technical assistance so their state/territory’s providers can successfully meet SAMHSA’s expectations. Thank you for your commitment to achieving these goals to support improved services and care coordination for those that the PATH program seeks to serve.

SOAR Webinar: Hearing Tips for SOAR Practitioners

SOAR News Flash Header - Top
SOAR News Flash Header - Left
June 4, 2015
SOAR News Flash Header - Left
SOAR News Flash Header - Bottom

SOAR Webinar: Hearing Tips for SOAR Practitioners

Thursday, June 25, 2015
3:00pm-4:30pm (EDT)

SOAR practitioners have proven their proficiency at assisting with initial SSI/SSDI applications. However, since appeals are a reality, we know that many are already assisting applicants to prepare for hearings or are interested in gaining the necessary skills to effectively represent SOAR applicants at the hearing level.
This webinar, to be held on Thursday, June 25, 2015, 3:00-4:30pm (EDT) will provide the tips and tools necessary to understand SSA's Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing process.  The focus is to inform the SOAR practitioner about the major activities performed by the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR), and what is expected from the Representative to prepare for and conduct a hearing in a Social Security disability claim.
Speakers will include attorney representatives who will share their knowledge and experience with representing SOAR applicants with ODAR. Webinar participants will gain firsthand knowledge from SOAR advocates who are obtaining great outcomes at the hearing level using SOAR.
  • Sarah F. Anderson, Senior Attorney/Elder, Health & Disability Unit at Greater Boston Legal Services in Boston, MA
  • Jessica Krefman, Attorney and SOAR Local Lead, Office of Recipient Rights at Livingston County Community Mental Health Authority in Howell, MI
Intended Audience: SOAR practitioners who understand SSA's sequential evaluation and disability application process, who are already conducting hearings or considering representing applicants at the hearing level.

Place-Based v. MTO: How About Solidarity Instead?
Thursday, June 4, 2015

Shelterforce in print
Cover of Shelterforce aging issue, number 178
One year for $18


Housing Opportunity 2015
This conference co-hosted by the Urban Land Institute and Enterprise Community Partners will explore how "some of the most pressing issues facing our communities can be addressed through affordable housing." Conference will be held July 13-15, in Minneapolis. Learn more here.

Help support 
the voice of 
community development

Donate Button
Your Voice!

Subscribe to 
It's free! Click here!

Shop our bookshelf at 

Shelterforce Weekly 
with your colleagues...

Temporary Home for Shelterforce Online Articles
Some readers have noticed unusually long loading times for our websites recently. The good news is we identified what was causing the speed problem. The bad news is that fixing it makes Shelterforce Online articles inaccessible. We're launching the process of giving the whole site a fresh start so we can have our content and load it too, but in the mean time we'll be posting all new articles to our blog site, Rooflines, so you can keep reading without interruption, though our archives will be temporarily unavailable. Thanks for your patience.

From Shelterforce Online

Serving the Community, In Their Language 
By Keli Tianga, Shelterforce

As the languages and cultures community groups serve change and multiply, how do they keep up? More

From Rooflines, the Shelterforce Blog

An Answer to San Francisco's Housing Woes?
By James Tracy, San Francisco Community Land Trust

Tracy Parent writes the budgets, pro-formas, and finance plans that put teeth into the idea of a "right to the city." In this Q&A she explains... More 

Gregory Squires Place, Poverty, and Politics: A Growing Divide 
By Greg Squires, George Washington University
Virtually all parties to this debate pay at least lip service to the need for both relocation and reinvestment. The challenge is whether agreement on such a dual agenda will become more than a throwaway line. To more concretely illustrate the emerging divide... More

Axel-Lute Seeking Solidarity Between Place-Based and Economic Justice Work

By Miriam Axel-Lute, Shelterforce

We need both a nationwide push for full employment and higher wages and an understanding of how place affects opportunity--but what does it mean concretely to act as if both are important and interdependent?... More

Local Hire: Popular and Controversial

By Laura Barrett, Gamaliel

For once the "good guys" seem to be prevailing on the DOT's local hire pilot program. This is good, but the program could be better. Here's how... More

You Said It!

Thank you, Gregory for an important post around the place-mobility debate. I have a simple approach to my CED work: Place-Based, People-Centered. At times, the approach is to strengthen efforts to empower communities and residents. Other times, families should seek opportunities through mobility. I share a similar fear and frustration that unless you endorse mobility as THE means for improving the lives of families and individuals then you're complicit in resegregation and promoting concentration of poverty in our neighborhoods. I will remain steadfast that an approach that embraces being place-based and people-centered allows for a two-prong approach to improve our communities. --Ray Neirinckxon "Place, Poverty, and Politics: A Growing Divide"
It is important for all of us who advocate for a "both/and" approach that encompasses both community revitalization and housing mobility, to acknowledge how far we are from any real balance in our national housing policy. Housing mobility, inclusionary zoning, and opportunity-based development in the LIHTC program are just a small fraction of our overall low-income housing investment. This is particularly true for families with children, and in our segregated metropolitan areas. Until we come to terms with the extent of this imbalance, it will be difficult to come to a real consensus on the kind of "balance" we are seeking. --Phil Tegeler, on "Place, Poverty, and Politics: A Growing Divide"

Featured Resources

Cover of Bounce Forward, Urban Resilience in the Era of Climate Change

Bounce Forward: Urban Resilience in the Era of Climate Change

Bounce Forward, a collaboration between the Kresge Foundation and Island Press, offers a framework for thinking about the critical role that U.S. cities have in mitigating the impacts of climate change and explores how urban areas can anticipate and plan for turbulent times brought on by drastic changes in the physical environment.

Download the full report here.


Omaha Municipal Land Bank
Omaha, NE 

The founding Executive Director will assemble their own team, in part to compliment the particular skills and knowledge he or she brings to the task. However, the Executive Director must be a proven leader with an entrepreneurial spirit. The position requires the Executive Director be well versed in finance, real estate, accounting, management and public relations.

Federal Reserve Bank of New York
New York, NY

The Bank's Outreach and Education Function engages, empowers, and educates the public in the Second District. Our outreach mission furthers the Bank's commitment to the region by listening to the communities we serve and leveraging our unique attributes to positively impact them.

More Jobs

For rates or to place an ad, go to
In This Issue

 Like us on Facebook     Follow us on Twitter     View our profile on LinkedIn 

Featured Bloggers
Transit Equity Network/Gamaliel

Regional Housing Legal Services

USC Price School of Public Policy

HOPE Credit Union

Burlington Associates

Democracy Collaborative

Columbia University

Tufts University

Fund for Public Schools

Planner, Louisa County, Va.

National CAPACD

Cornerstone Partnership

Opportunity Agenda


National Housing Institute

Housing Assistance Council


ACLU Maryland

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities 

George Washington Univesity

Housing Assistance Council 

Appalachian State University

San Francisco Community 
Land Trust

Harold Simon

Lisa Monetti
Assistant Publisher

Sara Steele Lau
Web Proofing Volunteer

Shelterforce Weekly 
60 S. Fullerton Avenue, Suite 202
Montclair, NJ 07042
(P) 973-509-1600
(F) 973-509-1602 

Miriam Axel-Lute

Keli Tianga
Associate Editor